The implicit message is not only that individuals are capable of rehabilitation but also that Vinyard was on the wrong side of history. After returning home he rebukes his brother for embracing the far right and the pair later remove Nazi paraphernalia from the walls of their shared bedroom.
Well, my conclusion is: Hate is baggage. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory will swell when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature. No such ending would be written today, or at least not in so neat a manner.
Derek Vinyard : Like what? Bob Sweeney: Has anything you've done made your life better? Trivia : At the end, when Danny is heard quoting from the paper he wrote for Dr. Sweeney, the quote which begins "We are not enemies, but friends Super Grover. Question : What happened to Little Henry after he killed Danny in the bathroom?
Answer: We don't find that out. It happens right at the end of the film, and we don't get to see the aftermath. Answer: This is what I'm trying to figure out - when he shot Danny he disappeared, he probably got away with it or he was arrested later on.
Asked 7 years, 4 months ago. Active 4 years, 9 months ago. Viewed 41k times. Improve this question. It sounds indeed subjective, but I also think this might be a very interesting question if phrased a bit more elabortately.
It's indeed a very unexpected and abrupt ending, but most probably exactly for that matter. I'm not sure this can be answered without being entirely opinion based Whether its effective is a different question, but also opinion based. I'm not sure this can be salvaged.
JohnSmithOptional But the ending has to somehow fit to the movie in some way or another. The question at least the new version is not saying that this wasn't the case with this movie, but asking in which way it was. Does the accepted answer have to satisfy the OP in such a way that he no longer considers the ending "improper"? Whether one likes such an ending, or considers it to be "improper" does seem kinda opinion based. And after the film was released, he was surprised by how it affected his self image.
People suddenly viewed him as much bigger and stronger than he was in real life, and he realized just how much the camera could warp perspectives. He explained, "It's unbelievable, the degree to which that film and the magic of camera and art and black and white photography and all these things made a lot of people think that I was a larger and tougher person than I am.
After all, he definitely didn't picture himself as intimidating as his character. While working on the film, Norton had to engage with the history of racism in America and understand why some people still turned to white supremacist groups, even though the major civil rights battles had already been won decades before. It's a complex topic, and Norton learned about the economic, social, and political factors that might push someone down this path.
At the time the film was released, Norton viewed it as a specifically American story, reflecting on why young, white men in particular were attracted to these extremist groups. However, he did acknowledge that many of the themes explored in the film would be relevant in other cultures, as well. It does not have the political underpinnings it seems to have in Europe. In American History X , Derek goes through a dramatic change as the narrative progresses.
Norton explained that it was already very difficult to understand the mindset of a deeply prejudiced skinhead, but his real achievement was conveying the inner journey of the character and his gradual shift in perspective. He wasn't just responsible for conveying Derek's hatred — he also had to express his eventual willingness to be open-minded, his compassion for his brother, and his pain at the film's somber conclusion.
The character of Derek pushed audiences to think critically, and playing him forced Norton to do the same. Edward Norton knew that audiences would probably react to Derek with disgust. But Norton didn't want viewers to criticize Derek without taking a hard look at themselves, too. One of the messages he hoped that people would take home from American History X was the fact that anyone can harbor prejudice, and patting ourselves on the back for being open-minded wasn't enough to tackle bigotry.
Norton aimed to show viewers that with the right circumstances, anyone can give in to this mindset, and we all have a responsibility to ask ourselves how can contribute to positive change. After all, Derek wasn't born a white supremacist.
0コメント